Serendip is an independent site partnering with faculty at multiple colleges and universities around the world. Happy exploring!

You are here

Response to Leigh Alexander

The Unknown's picture

People at birth are given a name.   It is this name that follows us through our lives, and gains meaning to those around us as we develop who we ourselves are.  Yet, as we struggle through the process of growth and reform, the gaining of knowledge and the loss of innocence, our names become more pliable to the world around us.  Just as we become more able to define ourselves, as we open our view of the environment we are a member of[1], we become more aware of the roles we should be playing[2], and the environment has the ability to pressure[3] our identities to shift accordingly. In Ruth Ozeki’s novel, All Over Creation, her pseudo-heroine, Yumi or Yummy, is aware of the delicate balance between her identity and the environment she is currently occupying.  Ozeki makes this relationship clear through the many shifts of names that both Yumi and her family members undergo. And although Yumi assumes many roles over the course of the novel, and shifts names ….[4]

            Yumi, given that name at birth, was given “Yummy” as a new identity, as a product of her environment.  Though her actual name was “Yumi” according to her, “…nobody…could say it right,” (Ozeki 5).  As a result, her name became aligned with a jingle that went “Yummy, yummy, yummy, I got love in my tummy,” (Ozeki 5).  It’s clear to the reader that this caused frustration for Yumi given the fact that, when her high school teacher/lover Elliot mispronounces her name multiple times she retorts back, “If you can’t pronounce it right, don’t say it at all,” (Ozeki 27).  In this way, her home life in Liberty Falls, Idaho becomes a place where her identity is misconstrued by her community members’ misunderstanding of her. In the same way that Yumi’s name is warped, so is the town’s perception of her, as an accused “bad seed” and a “little whore” (Ozeki 201-2).

            Yet, Yumi accepts “Yummy” as her name, giving her real estate site the name “Yummy Acres” rather than making use of her given name (Ozeki 32).  Yumi’s use of her pseudo-nickname “Yummy” in her business suggests the whimsical, childlike, or impulsive character of the real estate business, which, given the fact that it was run by her and one of the fathers of her children, whom she describes as someone who drives her “crazy, totally lolo,” and is “a ukulele player when he feels like it,” seems to make sense (Ozeki 128).[5] In Yumi’s teaching career however, she uses her given name Yumi, which suggests her ability to remain true to herself  (or to the name her parents gave her?) when she acts independently, and in a situation of power, like a professor, rather than a partner. This suggests that Yumi has not only accepted the notion that her identity, like her name, will be misconstrued, but also shows that she has enough strength to not let others’ misconceptions affect her personal identity..  

            That being said, it is clear that Yumi is aware of the proper names to be used in certain environments.  In such a way, she seems to let her identity, in the form of a role rather than personality[6], shift given the situation she finds herself in. [7]For example, when she returns with her children to Idaho, she says to her son: “Phoenix, remember what I told you.  This is Idaho.  Call me Mommy and stop swearing or the townsfolk will lynch you,” (Ozeki 61).  Here, it is clear that although Yumi’s identity has switched in name from “Yummy” to “Mommy,” Yumi is acting far from parental.[8]  This suggests that although Yumi sees the necessity of shifting surface appearances [9]of herself and her children given their social situation, she is comfortable enough to not make an internal shift in her personality[10].  In this way, Yumi becomes a social chameleon[11], shifting names instead of colors, but always remaining true to herself.[12] 

            This[13] is also true for Yumi’s understanding of other characters.  Like Yumi tells her children to call her Mommy while they are in Idaho, she also tells her children to call her father “Grandpa” rather than “Tutu Lloyd,” (Ozeki 72). Here Yumi does not deny the fact that this man is the same man whom she had spoken about casually about this man, but she still is aware of the necessity of addressing him in a more socially respectable manner than she would have in the casual environment of her home, which asserts her respect for social politeness.[14]

            Likewise, Ozeki’s other characters also shift the name they use in various environments in order to fit certain situations. A character who goes by the name “Y” comments that Yumi’s father is allowed to call him “Melvin” because “…he’s an elder” (Ozeki 144).  In this way, Y is yet another example of a character that is seemingly able to adapt his identity to fit different situations. He knew that the only way to win the respect of Lloyd was to make sure things were done in a way Lloyd would deem acceptable, and after Lloyd’s coy questioning of “What kind of name” Y was, Y knew better than to continue representing himself through a name that was so distant from the type of name Lloyd was used to.[15]  In this way, Y altered his presentation of his identity outwardly to appeal to his social situation, without consciously changing his objective of winning the respect of Lloyd.

            In summary[16], Ozeki makes use of the transitions or shifts in her character’s names in order to demonstrate establish a shift in their personal goals or audience, or, rather, Ozeki shifts her characters’ identities, with respect to their names, based on the environment they are situated in, creating multi-faceted, realistic characters that are far more believable to the reader.[17]

 

*Stronger ll btwn name and identity is needed here.

 

 

 

 

General Notes:

  1. 1.     What is the thesis? There is no thesis statement.
  2. 2.     You address a “loss of innocence” in your intro. What does this mean? You do not discuss this point in your paper. If you want to bring it up in your intro, it needs to be somewhere in your paper.
  3. 3.     I think the quotes would carry more weight and be more meaningful if you introduced them in a way that described the point you were trying to make when you decided to use them. Also if you described them in a more in-depth way afterward.
  4. 4.     If you want to discuss how other names and identities change throughout the novel, I think that you should not just discuss Yumi in your introductory paragraph.
  • ·       I like the idea that name define and expresses who people are.
  • ·       You use a lot of quotes which connects your ideas to specific examples and helps explain your ideas.
  • ·       I like the idea that our identities can shift with different names we take on.
  • ·       I like the idea that there is a “proper” name or certain way to define ourselves.
  • ·       I like the idea that identities are partially. a product of one’s environment.


[1] What does this mean?

[2] Who decided we should be playing these roles?

[3] How does this “pressure” our identities? What does this word mean?

[4] What is the thesis?

[5] Many great ideas, but it is a lot to take in all at once. Maybe you could make this sentence a couple of sentences.

[6] What is the difference between role and personality?

[7] Better introduction to the quote- lead it off- explain what the quote means, what are you trying to express to the reader with this quote?

[8] How is she acting “far from parental?” What does this mean?

[9] Strange prasing

[10] This is repetitive- internal shift, means effecting one’s personality.

[11] Maybe you could be a little more specific here. I am worried some might take the term “social chameleon” as meaning that she can shift her personality easily, but I am assuming that you are mainly talking about her identity and name.

[12] What does “remaining true to herself” mean? You have not clearly stated who she is- her characteristics

[13] What does “this” refer 2?

[14] Strange phrasing

[15] This sentence is too long. I had to reread it several times.

[16] Do not use the word summary. Show not tell. Make the conclusion flow more.

[17] Which one is it? This sentence is confusing and too long. You make two different points here. I think it would be better if there was 1 strong final statement.