Serendip is an independent site partnering with faculty at multiple colleges and universities around the world. Happy exploring!

Science as Problem-Solving

 

Adapted by Wil Franklin from Paul Grobstein, 2007  "Thinking about Science: Fact versus Story Telling"


 Science as a Never-ending Process of Problem-solving and Question-answering

A traditional perspective

 

A loopy story telling perspective


   

 

Science as body of facts established by specialized fact-generating people and processes

 

Science as successive approximations to Truth

 

 

Science as authority about "natural world

 

Science as ongoing story telling and story revision: repeated making of observations, interpreting and summarizing observations, making new observations, making new summaries ... individually and collectively, Potentially usable by and contributed to by everyone

Science as a process of problem-solving/question answering and if change is the only constant then it is a never-ending

 

Science as skepticism, a style of inquiry that can be used for anything, one which everybody is equipped to to/can get better at/be further empowered by, and contribute to - a way of making sense of what is but even more of exploring what might yet be

 

The crack
  • Multiple stories for a given set of observations
    • 3,5,7, .... ?
    • 1+1=2 or 1+1=10?
  • Observations in turn depend on stories
  • Science is as much about creation as about discovery

If science is as much about creation as discovery then the "crack"is a feature, not a bug ... and differences among people are an asset to the process rather than a problem or an indication it isn't working

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
16 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.