Reply to comment

I am kind of falling in love with this book, too. Considering the majority of our reading thus far I was prepared for a book that wreaked with terminology that was over my head, or theories that are densely scientific and difficult to understand (for me). Oddly enough as I started reading Properties I found that I picked up on many of the references to scientific/philosophical theories and almost completely missed the incredible metaphors/similes that Goldstein has created. Certainly it was not because Goldstein creative writing is not good, in fact, I feel just the opposite, I love how she writes. When i did catch the metaphors (and reread them) I became very excited. Where the book drew me in was how flawlessly and fluidly Goldstein brought together (in the beginning) Justin's narration of his memories and the theories at play. The transitions that Goldstein makes which highlight justin's inner turmoil, so to speak, the battle between soft and hard are of particular interest to me. Justin has these moments where he seems to envy dana's assuredness, the confidence with which she argues and converses as well in the way she "manipulates". He discusses his self-doubt, a topic both superficial and as well deeply philosophical. And yet, Justin still appears to the viewer as the "harder scientist". This cross-over of roles and characteristics is interesting because it muddles the seemingly clear-cut approach that many scientists have taken to separate themselves from softer fields and softer thinkers. I apologize for my very cumbersome and unfocused writing. Properties left me with many thoughts that I have yet to completely organize. Is my chaotic state of mind evidence of the power of Goldstein's book or perhaps a result of the fact that she has taken on too much? Either way, i'm enjoying the ride.