Serendip is an independent site partnering with faculty at multiple colleges and universities around the world. Happy exploring!

Home › Meta-Cognition ›

Reply to comment

Deborah Hazen's picture

Metacognition Fallout

Submitted by Deborah Hazen on Wed, 07/22/2009 - 1:16pm.

Great opportunity to be metacognitive about the things we need and the characteristics we look for in teachers as we learn.

How does this fit with our emerging understanding of inquiry learning? The activity this morning led me to think about the difference between an INQUIRY and inquiry activities.

A benefit of inquiry, in my mind, is that it creates an opportunity for teachers and students to treat their understandings skeptically and deepen understanding in an area. Inquiry activities or activities that demonstrate inquiry attributes seem less useful as avenues to confront currently help perspectives and deepen understanding.

What do others think about the differences and usefulness of these two ways of looking at inquiry?

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
3 + 10 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Remote Ready Biology Learning Activities

Scanning electron microscope image of SARS-CoV-2

Remote Ready Biology Learning Activities has 50 remote-ready activities, which work for either your classroom or remote teaching.

Narrative is determined not by a desire to narrate but by a desire to exchange. (Roland Barthes, S/Z)

What's New? Subscribe to Serendip Studio