Serendip is an independent site partnering with faculty at multiple colleges and universities around the world. Happy exploring!

Home › Science, culture, education, and the brain ›

Reply to comment

alesnick's picture

a reaction and a question

Submitted by alesnick on Sat, 03/27/2010 - 8:22pm.

I'm intrigued by the possibility that accepting "getting it less wrong" as a target needn't commit one to believe in "getting it right."  Getting it less wrong seems like an open-ended target, one that responds to problems and possibilities of the past, present, and future.  Getting it right seems to bring striving and exploration to an end/point/bullseye.  To take the work out of time in a sense.

My question is whether it's necessary or useful to talk about assessing inquiry skills in a formal ed. context.  In informal ed contexts, "assessment" is evolution -- it is what happens as a result of one's inquiries.  When we symbolize what happens in terms of "assessment mechanisms," isn't something really important lost in translation, and don't we take on problems that block future efforts to get it less wrong?

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
5 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Remote Ready Biology Learning Activities

Scanning electron microscope image of SARS-CoV-2

Remote Ready Biology Learning Activities has 50 remote-ready activities, which work for either your classroom or remote teaching.

Narrative is determined not by a desire to narrate but by a desire to exchange. (Roland Barthes, S/Z)

What's New? Subscribe to Serendip Studio