Serendip is an independent site partnering with faculty at multiple colleges and universities around the world. Happy exploring!

Reply to comment

katlittrell's picture

Why shouldn't a character's death be important?

Fictional characters can die.

I think that it doesn't matter to the character whether the book itself is destroyed: that would be the death of the book.

I'll use "Othello" as an example. Every time "Othello" is performed (or read), Othello, Desdemona (and many supporting characters) die. When the play is restarted, they are alive again, but that doesn't reduce the significance of their death.

Just because they are fictional, doesn't mean they can't die. The fact that a character exists does not negate the fact that s/he dies.

Death is emotional, significant symbolically and generally an important plot point. Why shouldn't we fixate on whether or not Thassa died? It changes our reading of the ending, the meaning of the ending, and the meaning of several parts of the book, particularly Tonia Schiff's.

On a slightly different tangent, perhaps the reason that the emotional connections to this particular character's death could be taken as amusing is because it appears that Powers doesn't particularly want his readers to emotionally connect to his characters. Though, I have to ask, what's the point of fiction if there is no emotional connection? Who wants to read and re-read and fall in love with a novel which has no desire to engender an emotional connection in its readers?

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.
1 + 18 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.