Serendip is an independent site partnering with faculty at multiple colleges and universities around the world. Happy exploring!

dear.abby's picture

the queer classroom and self confidence

On a scale of 1-10, 1 being “are you even registered in this class? do you know where you are? and 10 being “you are fully present, prepared and engaged”, I would say I was an average of a 6.5 being that some days I was about a 1 and most days I was a 7.5-8. That being said, I was an average of about a 4 in my “real life” this semester 1 being “you are stagnant, you might as well be dead” and 10 being “your life has self motivated forward momentum”.  So my participation and contribution was patchy at best, but you already know that. Though think I was more present in the small discussions than in the larger ones. Everything I did for class was “focused on my own learning” though I am not really sure what else it could have focused on…I was trying to contribute to the learning of others online. By this I mean that I was trying or hoping generally to engage with a discussion in my postings. I don’t think I have been thinking of how I might be contributing to others learning, in the sense that I don’t ever find myself wanting others to come to my point of view or position of understanding—I don’t consider myself a teacher within the classroom.

FrigginSushi's picture

Self Evaluation

Sorry, I did not see this.

I felt that because there were a lot of people in the class that were more knowledgable in Gender studies than I was, I found myself wide-eyed and agap with the kind of analysis that they were coming up with. In the beginning, I felt like I wasn't talking as much as I normally do because I wasn't confident in myself, but soon I just started to say whatever I felt I could contribute. Whether it was a comment that related things to my own experience with what we were talking about, or a question that I had no intenstion in answering myself but maybe someone else might be able to think of something and give any sort of insight along the way to the answer, I tried to say whatever I could.

I think in this experience, I've learned to acknowledge the other side of learning that I wasn't used to in the first place. I was very used to keeping conversation and staying on the same plane as most of the other students. I was used to learning things on my own, doing things on my own to find a result. But here, I was really relying on other students to help me grow into a more feminist thinking student.

I took a lot of notes and most of them where questions that arose form the discussion because it was interesting to me how we got from one question to the next. The class as a whole and how our train of thought took us to where we ended up. i found myself thinking of more questions similar to what we came up with in the class before for the next class's readings.

colleenaryanne's picture

Diffracting - finding my voice and my passion

             This class was a journey in many ways for me.  This is my first Anne Dalke class, and so I have never experienced this type of class structure before.  I certainly have mixed feelings, and my learning process in this class has been shaky and informative at the same time.  As discussed ad nauseum in mine and others’ final web events, the class was structured in such a way that there were vast gaps in understanding and education between many of my peers.  I was unfortunately at the “lower” end of what felt like a hierarchy of education, and so was often uncomfortable expressing my ideas for fear of being looked down upon as less understanding and uneducated.  As an intro course I question how useful it is to have people with extensive knowledge in the class – they were often bored and frustrated with the others (myself) in the class who were still learning.  Having people in the class with higher levels of understanding can be incredibly useful in that it can engender conversation that would not be possible with a group of people new to the topic, and often times the conversation was very interesting because of the levels of understanding some people had.  However, occasionally that left others out of the conversation, because it would go over their (our) heads.  But again, simply listening to other people have these conversations was useful, because I for one learn a lot from listening to other people. 

hwink's picture

Reflections

When I reflect on the semester and my role in conversation and levels of participation, I have a lot of mixed feelings. I am very regretful of my lack of presence on the course forum-- that was an entire aspect of conversation for the class that I really think I missed out on a great deal. I did engage, but only as a lurker and passive reader, which is certainly a shame because I think one of the lessons of this course was to value your own voice as well as the others around you (something that many conversations in class over the semester would lead me to believe is a feminist project). I think that while I managed to really enjoy the ability to see the thoughts of my peers develop on the forum, I did not really trust in the value of my own words.

In class, however, I definitely feel like I was a pretty active and useful member of discussion. I was always very interested in the voices around me, and, unlike my reaction to serendip, was able to trust in the worthiness of my own thoughts enough to share them. I really hope, and think it is not out of line to say that I think it’s true, that I was a good community member in that I contributed as much as I was taking. Or perhaps, a less possessive and more appropriate phrasing, I engaged fully in the shared experience of conversation and therefore did my best to enrich and be enriched.

jrlewis's picture

Tell Me a Story...

 

 

Monday, I texted him, “tell me story…”

Thursday, my mate sat across from me starting with,

“I was walking to work when I was almost run over;

It was a man on a unicycle racing to make the ferry

I being crew, he inquired, ‘if his unicycle could

Be checked with the bicycles.’ ‘That’s correct,’

I told him. ‘But, could I ride his unicycle? I

Had ridden in my youth, and a pony too.’

He assented yet insisted on support,

Which was right because I failed

Only to look down and see

His hands holding me

Not the seat,”

He said.

colleenaryanne's picture

Trans* Task Force: DLT Training and Q-Forum

Trans* Task Force: aybala50, amorphast, S. Yeager, MC and myself

Working towards breaking the gender binary at Bryn Mawr College and helping the queer folk on campus feel more welcome and at home. 

Quick definitions for our visiting guests:

Customs week – one week before classes start, the freshman arrive on campus for a week long orientation led by the DLT

Customs group – freshman are grouped together generally by hall to create customs groups, which are led by Customs People. 

DLT – Dorm Leadership Team

This includes:

HA (Hall Advisor) – One student on every dorm hallway who is basically in charge of everything on the hall.

Customs People – 2-3 students on each hall who are in charge of helping the freshman through their first year at Bryn Mawr.

CDA (Community Diversity Assistant) – Previously one per dorm, now only six on campus. They are students who “are charged with raising awareness of diversity issues and helping their friends and neighbors talk about them.”

hwink's picture

Queering Weakness: The Refusal of Strong Female Characters


She lies there, ethereal, frail, beautiful. High in a tower, or preserved in a glass casket, or trapped in her wicked stepmother’s house, she awaits a kiss from a dashing male rescuer. She haunts our Disney movies and cheesiest romance novels. She is the damsel in distress, and we are sick of her. Feminism has declared the damsel in distress out, and taken up a rallying cry for strong female characters, women who don’t sit and wait to be rescued. Women who kick ass and take charge, who are characterized by strength and impenetrability. But is this really what we asked for, or what we wanted? Who is the “strong female character” that gets produced? What is the nature of “strength” and why do we value it in our female characters?

Kate Beaton, creator of the webcomic “Hark! A Vagrant”, in collaboration with two other cartoonists, Meredith Gran and Carly Monardo, created a small series of comics called “Strong Female Characters”. In the author’s notes on her site, Beaton comments:


“We are professionals in the entertainment industry and we think we know what we are talking about when we say that there needs to be more strong female characters out there and we know just what to do about it. Finally, some women to look up to!”

EGrumer's picture

The Self-Evaluation of Elizabeth

I entered the first class unsure of what I would find. I knew it was a genre course, but I didn't really now what that meant. I thought of genre as a way of categorizing books, but I wasn't even entirely sure that was what we would be looking at. Would be just read “genre” fiction, like science-fiction? I was almost more trepidations than curious. At the back of my mind, I knew that it was still shopping period. I could drop the course, but I was too intrigued to do so.

I didn't talk that much, for the first several classes. I didn't feel comfortable. I was worried that I had nothing interesting to contribute. I had never studied the digital humanities, and I was sure that I would reveal my ignorance. Sometimes, I would find myself feeling passionate about something (for example, when we read “Mad at School” I definitely wanted to give my thoughts, as someone with depression and OCD). At the same time, I worried about being judged – especially when I revealed personal things that I never talk about, like my mental illness. Sometimes, I would hold myself back. Other times, I found myself sharing things I never talk about; most of my friends here at Bryn Mawr don't know that I have depression and OCD, for example, but I wanted to share them, even when I didn't feel comfortable.

buffalo's picture

Final Reflection

In the beginning of this class I was very focused on defining feminism. I hadn’t taken any classes in feminism or related topics before, so I was nervous and excited. I remember one of the first activities we did was break into small groups and try to define feminism, and I was surprised about how hard that task was! I had assumed feminism just had one definition, but now I know there are so many different ways to think about feminism, and I was challenged by trying to apply them to all the different situations we talked about.         There were a lot of ups and downs for me in this class. My joys were some of the works that we did such as Middlesex, Half the Sky, My Gender Workbook, Nude Girls Unite!, and Persepolis (there are others I really enjoyed, but these are the ones that stick out to me). So I really liked reading/watching most of the works we covered, but then discussion in class often stressed me out. I knew the material, but either felt like I had nothing to say, or that what I was thinking would be insignificant to the discussion. There were some works that I felt I couldn’t grasp, like Lifting Bellies, but I’m happy I got exposure to more advanced materials – it was definitely a challenge trying to make sense of it.

sterrab's picture

Remembering and Wishing

            I was a tourist. And so I stated as I reflected on one month of participation on Serendip and the course. I had been fascinated by the interactive work on the online platform and the subdiscipline of the digital humanities. On my first day, I assumed many things about the course and myself. I guess that’s why we should never assume things. I had eventually evolved out of the generalizations I had made.  I finally adopted the open classroom and the interesting discussions that branched out from title analyses or word definitions and were ongoing on Serendip. But there I was again, an observer, failing to pull my camera down to see what lay ahead of me with my own eyes.

            I have tended to remain silent many times, but not out of shyness or indifference. I grew to listen to what my classmates had to say, as I found the conversations to be intricately fascinating and chose to sit back and take in.  I can be a silent participant, but I did speak up every once in a while when I thought my contributions could be useful to the comments of others. Even if the board activities were imposing, I like how they sometimes forced me to be more outwardly vocal. I sometimes feel too self-conscious about my opinions that I do not speak up. The board activities challenged me to get up and share something, whatever it may be, finally stating what I kept to myself out of hesitation.

Syndicate content